Showing posts with label Lake of Fire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lake of Fire. Show all posts

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Limne refers to a Body of Water

This is a follow up of sorts to the post on my main theology Blog about how The Lake of Fire is the Baptism of Fire, which was also relevant on this Blog to the Baptism of The Beast.

A fellow believer in Universal Salvation on YouTube who’s channel is titled Total Victory of Christ has made a big deal of arguing that Lake is an inaccurate translation of Limne, and in terms of what the word Lake implies about size to a modern English reader he may be correct.  However the word definitely inherently refers to a body of water.

Its number in the Strongs Concordance is G3041 and the only other NT author to use it is Luke where it’s always tied to the Sea of Galilee.  His theory that this refers to a specific Harbor rather than the Sea as a whole seemed plausible to me at first, but Luke 8:22-23 is a big problem for that.  However ultimately even if that theory is true it’s still a body of water.. 

Limne appears in the LXX three times, in Psalm 107:35 and 114:8 where it’s used for what the KJV calls Standing Water, and in Song of Songs 7:4 where it’s “Fishpools” in the KJV.  The Hebrew words behind them are different but both are words always used of bodies of water and get translated into English with words like “pool” and “pond”.

Luke also uses the closely related word Limen G3040 in Acts 27:8-12 for harbors on Crete which the KJV translates Haven. Limen’s one appearance is the LXX was in Psalm 107:30 which is also Haven in the KJV. 

I agree that the metal refining imagery of Isaiah 48:10, Zechariah 13:9, Malachi 3:2-3 and Proverbs 17:3 & 27:21 has a role to play in understanding The Lake of Fire, but we can’t use symbolism to justify a translation decision when we know there were actual Greek words for "refining pot" or "crucible" that John could have used.  

In response to the argument that no one translated it “lake” before Tyndale, well no one wrote a Modern English Bible before Tyndale so there’s a lot of words no Bibles used before him.  But the Vulgate uses stagnum which means pool or pond so still a body of water. Researching what exactly was used in the Wycliffe Bible isn’t proving easy but it seems he too used Middle English synonyms for pond or pool.

The Greek word Baptize means to immerse or wash typically in water.  So I believe a word for a body of water is used here to guide readers to conclude this is the Baptism of Fire spoken of by John The Baptist.  It’s conveying the idea of Baptism without using the word.

Now I could likewise try to translate the verse in a way that would bias readers towards my interpretation by rendering it Baptistry or Mikveh to appeal to the Hebrew Roots people, or let my Weeb tendencies take over and suggest Chozuya, but I don't think that's an honest approach. 

My only issue with Pool is that there is a different Greek word translated Pool in the KJV used in John 5 for the Pool of Bethesda and John 9 for the Pool of Siloam. That word has an etymology that could more specifically be translated Swimmingpool, though both these pools were notably used for ritual bathing.  These two words do seem synonymous enough to justify translating into the same English word. 

However the traditional view that the 4th Gospel and The Apocalypse have the same author might make it difficult for some to accept they’re using different words for the same kind of thing.  However I’ve become convinced that the Beloved Disciple can’t be a son of Zebedee and is either Lazarus or his sister Mary Magdalene. Using Limne over Kolumbertha isn’t the only way I’ve observed Revelation to be more inline with Luke then the 4th Gospel in terms of vocabulary.

The size of this body of water isn’t the reason infernalists think these passages support them, lots of people being in it clearly makes it larger than a normal “refining pot”.  You could translate it as Lake or Sea or Ocean it doesn’t matter, what matters is getting people to understand that the fire is God’s Purging Fire.

So the more I think about it the more I come back to thinking Tyndale had it right, lake is perfectly fine, I even like the symmetry of it beginning with the same letter.  God is using this Lake as a giant refining pot.

Update February 12th 2026: Today I just learned that in Laconia there is a city called Limnae because it was founded on the river Eurotas. 

If Limne can even refer to rivers then that fits my Baptism connection even more, since New Testament Baptisms are typically performed in rivers. 

Actually when comparing Luke 5:1 to it's parallel in Matthew 4, it's context being where Galilee meets the Jordan could make sense. 

Thursday, October 19, 2023

Baptism of The Beast

Unlike other examples of me remaking an old blogpost of mine here this I won't modify the text of it to be spoken from my current thinking POV due to it's importance as a turning point in my thinking.  So I shall copy/paste the thoughts I expressed on September 28th 2023, just be aware at the time I still considered myself mainly a Futurist and Pre-Millennial though that obviously changed since.

My ultimate view on The Beast is that's Rome as a collective unit not any individual Emperor or Leader.  I will on this Blog occasionally talk about models for the Fulfilment of Revelation but put the focus on a single Emperor, but my main view is collective.

A factor I should have stressed more in the original is the association of Baptism with Repentance.

____________


Back in 2018 I argued on my other blog that The Lake of Fire is the Baptism of Fire.  It is chiefly part of how I argue for Universal Salvation.  But one implication of that I failed to focus on, The Beast and False Prophet are cast into The Lake of Fire without being killed first.  In other words the chief villains of this narrative become Christians in the context of my Lake of Fire view.  And the significance of that didn't hit me till today, the same day I'm posting this.

Now when I wrote that I wasn't as open to Partial-Preterism/Post-Millenialism as I have been the last couple years.  This Epiphany has increased my openness even more.

But there are still things to work out, it can be compatible with Futurism but it means the "Antichrist" isn't the irredeemable Demon-Man popular fiction based on the End Times likes to Imagine.

The thing is most legitimate Eschatology scholars whether Futurist, Historicist or Preterist do see The beast as in some capacity being Rome.  So I just opened the door to seeing the Christianization of Rome as part of Bible Prophecy.

But I am still not open to Full Preterism and my Post-Millennialism would still have to be Revivalist not Reconstructionist, since The Beast and False prophet are still in The Lake over a Thousand years later the purging of whatever they represent into truly Christ Like Kingdoms is a process that is still ongoing.

One could also consider Ticonius, he is considered the founder of Post-Millennialism yet his version of it went hand in hand with a basically Historicist view of II Thessalonians 2.

The most recent post on that blog about the Edict of Toleration may be relevant to my now developing ideas, but I have lots of details to work out.

As I said before I'll basically retire this Blog and start a new one if I fully leave Futurism, but for now I'm still thinking.

Gog cannot be identified with The Beast of Revelation 13-19

One thing that really baffles me is all the people who dismiss the significance of the actual names of Gog and Magog appearing in Revelation...