The two references in Revelation 2-3 to “them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan” is commonly interpreted as referring to Non Christian Jews partly on the authority of John 8:44.
If that theory is true the way it’s used by Antisemitic Christians is still invalid. In the 1st and 2nd Centuries AD Judaism was still a more privileged Religion then Christianity. Jews were exempted from the legally mandated worship of the Imperial Cult because the Romans considered an Ancient Religion. Christians were included in that exception when they were still perceived by outsiders as a sect of Judaism which they almost always were before the Bar Kochba Revolt and even often for a while after.
The only thing that may have prevented them from being so exempted is if the prominent Jews told the Roman authorities they don’t count as Jews. So the theory is some Jews (probably a minority of them) in Asia were doing that and so Jesus is simply responding to that by saying no you are the ones who’ve forfeited your Jewishness.
Today it's the Christians who have the political Privilege and need to learn to see Jews as brethren regardless of where we diverge.
But moving on, the problem with that assumption about the Synagogue of Satan is the two cities who’s Messages to their Churches include this reference are ones with a severe lack of any evidence of any Ancient Jewish Presence independent of this interpretation of Revelation.
For Smyrna even the Encyclopedia Judaica has only Revelation the Martyrdom of Polycarp to go on for any claim of an Ancient Jewish presence in the City, otherwise they have no records of Jews in Smyrna till 1605.
And the Martyrdom of Polycarp is not a reliable source, it was written long after the events it depicts and depicts an event almost always dated later than even my very late date for Revelation. And it wouldn’t be an independent source, the authority may well be imagining Jews to have been involved because of what they assumed about Revelation. Polycarp’s own Epistle makes no reference to Jews.
With Philadelphia also we only have this possible Revelation reference. If you Google it the AI Review will say they’re also referenced in Ignatius of Antioch’s letter to the Philadelphians, but no he’s just talking about Christian who still observe Jewish Laws, and is arguably only warning about the theoretically possible of his readers encountering them not real confirming there even are any in Philadelphia.
And it’s not as if the entirety of Jewish Presence of Roman Asia was undocumented. We have a lot of references to the affairs of Jews in Ephesus from Josephus to The Book of Acts and same with Miletus. It’s also well documented how Antiochus III Megas settled Jews in both Laodicea and Hierapolis. Josephus also records the existence of a Jewish community in Sardis. Pergamon and Thyatira however do seem to share Smyrna and Philadelphia lack of Ancient Jews, though the Lydian woman of Thyatira in Acts 16:12-15 seems to be implied to be Jewish or at least a Proselyte.
Philadelphia was a pretty small city today viewed as important only because of its Revelation significance, the message to Philadelphia in Revelation 3 arguably alluded to this being a small insignificant church in a small insignificant town. So the idea that the affairs of its Jewish population would be overlooked even by Josephus I could consider plausible.
But Smyrna was important, it was the birthplace of the Roma Cult and thus equal to Pergamon as a provincial center of the Imperial Cult. There’s no way if they had a Jewish Population they did nothing worth noting by Josephus. Maybe they avoided settling in Smyrna and Pergamon precisely because of their cult center status?
What Alternative interpretation of the Synagogue of Satan is there then? Well early forms of Supersessionism were popping up shockingly early.
I’m not Dispensationalist but I still reject the notion that Jews are completely abandoned. Saying “All Israel shall be Saved” in Romans 11:25-26 is a meaningless statement if you define Israel as only being the Saved. It's not about whether The Church and Israel are separate Tents, it's about how big the Tent is.
No comments:
Post a Comment